Friday, March 13, 2009

Farmland Protection Partners: Action Needed Today for FRPP

American Farmland Trust
Dairy Farm in Sprint

March 13, 2009

Take Action on Federal Farm and Ranchlands Protection Program Interim Final Rule

Holstien Cows Resting 

Donate

In 2008, Congress made significant changes to the federal Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program (FRPP) to allow for greater flexibility by program partners at the state and local level. 

One key change was to state that the federal government’s role in the program is to facilitate and provide funding for the purchase of conservation easements, not to purchase the easements directly. Unfortunately, in the Interim Final Rule released in January, the U.S. Department of Agriculture essentially ignored this change and continued many of the program’s cumbersome requirements that have made FRPP a difficult partner in state and local farmland protection efforts. 

Now is the time to make your voice heard at USDA! The comment period for the Interim Final Rule ends on March 17th

If you are a landowner, a land trust, a state or local farmland protection program administrator, or concerned citizen who cares about this important federal program, please take the time to let USDA know that the rule should be changed to reflect Congressional intent and to work more effectively for farmers and state and local program partners.  Comments can be emailed to USDA at frpp2008@wdc.usda.gov. Be sure to include the docket number on your comments: Docket Number NRCS-IFR-08006.

We believe USDA must address the following five issues to improve the program’s flexibility for state and local partners: 

  • Make it clear that the federal government is not purchasing a federal property interest, but rather the right to enforce the terms of an easement when and if necessary;

  • USDA should establish a meaningful certification process to reduce cumbersome and unneeded program requirements for experienced entities;

  • While well-intentioned, the new forest management plan requirement is burdensome and should be eliminated or significantly revised;

  • The rule should follow Congressional intent and give program partners the flexibility to design and implement their own impervious surfaces standards; and,

  • The new national ranking criteria do not adequately recognize state and local farmland protection goals; entities that become certified should be allowed to use their own criteria for ranking farmland protection projects.

For more information on these issues, please read our AFT “Top Five” concerns related to the program. You may also contact me at bwagner@farmland.org,

Sincerely,

Bob Wagner
Bob Wagner

Senior Director Farmland Protection Programs
American Farmland Trust
 



© Copyright 2006, American Farmland Trust. All rights reserved.
1200 18th Street, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20036
(202)-331-7300

No comments: